Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 10:01:43 01/05/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2006 at 12:36:22, Oreopoulos Kostas wrote: >I have been testing Winfinder in Nolot 1 and some other positions > >My first impression is > >If the position is "easy" then an ambition about 0,60 will find a winning >variation very fast. > >In a very very hard position, like nolot, a high setting like 2.0 will result to >very bad results. >For such hard positions, propably as small ambition like 0.3-0.4 would be >better. Only Question is, what is a very hard position? This: BS-Test, Position 1: [D]4r1k1/p1pb1ppp/Qbp1r3/8/1P6/2Pq1B2/R2P1PPP/2B2RK1 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Rybka WinFinder 1.0 32-bit (on P3 600 MHz, 64 MB hash): 1...Td6+ ³ (-0.36) Tiefe: 3 00:00:00 1...Td6+ ³ (-0.41) Tiefe: 4 00:00:00 1...Dxa6+ ³ (-0.48) Tiefe: 4 00:00:00 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 = (-0.20) Tiefe: 5 00:00:00 1...Td6+ 2.Dxd3 ³ (-0.37) Tiefe: 5 00:00:00 1...Td6+ 2.Dxd3 Txd3+ 3.La3 ³ (-0.40) Tiefe: 6 00:00:00 49kN 1...Td6+ 2.Dxd3 Txd3+ 3.La3 Le6 ³ (-0.45) Tiefe: 7 00:00:01 49kN 1...Td6+ 2.Dxd3 Txd3+ 3.La3 Le6 4.Lxc6+ ³ (-0.52) Tiefe: 8 00:00:02 49kN 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 c5+ 3.Lg4 cxb4+ µ (-1.00) Tiefe: 8 00:00:02 49kN 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 c5+ 3.Lg4 cxb4+ 4.cxb4 Td6+ µ (-1.19) Tiefe: 9 00:00:03 49kN 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 c5+ 3.Lg4 cxb4+ 4.cxb4 Td6+ 5.Lxd7+ µ (-1.10) Tiefe: 10 00:00:04 67kN 1...Dxf3+ 2.gxf3 Tg6+ 3.Kh1 Lh3 4.Dd3 f5 5.Dc4 Kf8 -+ (-1.70) Tiefe: 12 00:00:11 184kN 1...Dxf3+ 2.gxf3 Tg6+ 3.Kh1 Lh3 4.Dd3 f5 5.Td1 Lg2+ 6.Kg1 Lxf3+ 7.Kf1 Lxd1 -+ (-2.30) Tiefe: 14 00:00:27 489kN (Nemeth, Privat 05.01.2006) Rybka WinFinder 1.0 need only 11s on my slow computer!! BS-Test, Pos. 1: 4r1k1/p1pb1ppp/Qbp1r3/8/1P6/2Pq1B2/R2P1PPP/2B2RK1 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Rybka 1.01 Preview 2 32-bit: 1...Td6+ ³ (-0.36) Tiefe: 3 00:00:00 1...Td6+ ³ (-0.41) Tiefe: 4 00:00:00 1...Dxa6+ ³ (-0.48) Tiefe: 4 00:00:00 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 = (-0.20) Tiefe: 5 00:00:00 1...Td6+ 2.Dxd3 ³ (-0.37) Tiefe: 5 00:00:01 1...Td6+ 2.Dxd3 Txd3+ 3.La3 ³ (-0.40) Tiefe: 6 00:00:01 7kN 1...Td6+ 2.Dxd3 Txd3+ 3.La3 Te5+ ³ (-0.48) Tiefe: 7 00:00:01 16kN 1...Td6+ 2.Dxd3 Txd3+ 3.La3 Le6 4.Lxc6+ ³ (-0.52) Tiefe: 8 00:00:03 42kN 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 c5+ 3.Lg4 cxb4+ µ (-1.00) Tiefe: 8 00:00:03 50kN 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 c5+ 3.Lg4 cxb4+ 4.cxb4 Td6+ µ (-1.19) Tiefe: 9 00:00:04 67kN 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 c5+ 3.Lg4 cxb4+ 4.cxb4 Td6+ 5.Lxd7+ µ (-1.10) Tiefe: 10 00:00:05 96kN 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 c5+ 3.Lg4 cxb4+ 4.cxb4 Td6+ 5.Lxd7+ Txd7+ 6.Ta3 µ (-1.23) Tiefe: 11 00:00:08 189kN 1...Dxa6+ 2.Txa6 c5+ 3.Lg4 cxb4+ 4.cxb4 Td6+ 5.Lxd7+ Txd7+ 6.Ta3 Td4+ µ (-1.01) Tiefe: 12 00:00:13 329kN 1...Dxf3+ 2.gxf3 Tg6+ 3.Kh1 Lh3 4.Dd3 f5 5.Td1 Lxf2 6.Dc4 Kf8 7.Df1 -+ (-1.89) Tiefe: 12 00:00:20 553kN 1...Dxf3+ 2.gxf3 Tg6+ 3.Kh1 Lh3 4.Dd3 f5 5.Td1 Lg2+ 6.Kg1 Lxf3+ 7.Kf1 Lxd1 8.Ta1 -+ (-2.11) Tiefe: 13 00:00:29 854kN (Nemeth, Privat 05.01.2006) Rybka 1.01 Preview 2 need 20s to solved this position on my P3 600 MHz! :-) > >But i guess Vasik could tell us how to use the settings efficiently. >Anyone tested it with nolots?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.