Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What is Seperate Tool Good For?

Author: Eelco de Groot

Date: 14:00:40 01/05/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 05, 2006 at 16:34:52, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>On January 05, 2006 at 12:18:52, Vasik Rajlich wrote:
>
>>On January 05, 2006 at 09:25:15, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>On January 05, 2006 at 08:49:15, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Errh, I dont read the emails of Vas, so could you please post it here?
>>>>
>>>>A little bit from the Readme by the Programmer:
>>>>
>>>>"As its name implies, Rybka WinFinder can be used to look for wins. It can spot
>>>>and evaluate long, complex tactical variations much faster than the normal Rybka
>>>>engine. If you have some complex position and just want to know if one side can
>>>>somehow win material or get a clear advantage, this is the tool you want."
>>>
>>>A little example see here:
>>>
>>>http://f27.parsimony.net/forum67838/messages/1383.htm
>>>
>>>ED.
>>
>>Yes, this is the idea. On average it should find tactics like this much faster.
>>
>>Vas
>
>
>What would be the difficulty to include it into the "normal" program so that a
>sort of always present tactical speedy is looking for some food? I dont
>understand the meaning of a "seperate" tool. Isnt it something which screws the
>general strength of the program?

If it was part of the general program it would eat up CPU time in the
background, that would screw with the general strenghth of Rybka. I think the
real use of this tool is if it can avoid the "false positives". It is easy to
tune for finding combinations, but weeding out the AM moves with deep tactics is
the hard part for Vas. So, I'd suggest letting loose a enormous bunch of avoid
moves on the winfinder and see how it does!

Actually such testposions I would be interested in too, especially if they are
checked. I know the Swiss test, but it is only 64 positions that are more for
testing general programstrength. I think with a couple of hundred positions,
each tested for a minute or so, such a test would be more useful.

 Eelco



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.