Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What is Seperate Tool Good For?

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 15:12:04 01/05/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 05, 2006 at 18:00:31, Eelco de Groot wrote:

>Hello Rolf,
>
>In 1982, was that not also in the time of Botwinnik and his Pioneer
>chessprogram? Botwinnik also started his program to solve some very special
>positions, taken from his own games of course. Pioneer could solve these
>positions even faster than Botwinnik himself and for him it was clear this was
>the way to go, to make the ultimate chess champion. But he did not have access
>to any modern computers, not even a simple IBM PC that was just coming available
>in the west. The big computers that he used in Moscow were meant to calculate
>the needed coal and energy supplies I believe to keep Russian feet warm in the
>freezing winter. Programming for chess only in his spare time, Pioneer never
>made it into a real chess playing program, as far as I know. It is a pity that
>Botwinnik could not make use of some modern chess sources to start with, he
>could also be a very methodical man and could have made something really
>special, if he had found a method for programming his own ideas to make chess
>programs stronger.
>
> Eelco

I dont believe in Russian Science anymore since 1986. I have a single solution
for Botvinnik's delusion. He was not really a scientist. He was influenced by
politics and of course his huge chess involvement prevented deeper insight.
Otherwise it's completely spooky how he could lose himself in such dreams. When
I was young I realy believed in Botvinnik the engineer for electrics. Then
during my own studies I saw that the best in either maths or physics or also
then psychology (I knew someone who had participated in the Students Olympiads
and who had written a chess paper for his diploma but then when I met him once
again he was into a different job and said he were out of chess for reasons of
time - that was a shock for me) simply couldnt succeed in both spheres. You cant
do anything relevant in science if you are a professional chessplayer or a
player from the former SU. Even a genius couldnt. It's just too time-consuming.
- Thanks for bringing me to the very center of what I wanted to say. -Rolf



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.