Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 16:00:53 01/05/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2006 at 18:55:43, Jay Scott wrote: >On January 04, 2006 at 14:52:06, Stuart Cracraft wrote: > >>So, has anyone actually used these CNS and CNS-derived ideas in >>a chess program? > >P.ConNerS by Ulf Lorenz used a conspiracy-number search, and it was a fairly >successful program. > >http://wwwcs.uni-paderborn.de/fachbereich/AG/monien/PERSONAL/FLULO/Lehre/ParProg/CUMPI/pconners.html > >http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=378737&dl=GUIDE&coll=GUIDE&CFID=64521218&CFTOKEN=31814011 > > Jay My hunch is this success was due to the heavy parallelism implemented well, rather than the CNS. He might have done better with the CNS not in, based on Vincent's experience. Stuart
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.