Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 11:10:41 01/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2006 at 13:50:11, Graham Banks wrote: >On January 06, 2006 at 06:07:09, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On January 05, 2006 at 19:53:06, enrico carrisco wrote: >> >>>The CSS Rating List is complete and available at the link below. I've >>>translated the German introduction to english -- but be aware: I am not a >>>native German speaker and there could be some slight mistakes. Overall, the >>>message should be very close. >>> >>>Regards, >>> >>>-elc. >>> >>> >>>Link: >>>http://www.computerschach.de/index.php?option=com_wrapper&wrap=Rangliste&Itemid=127 >> >>Reason: CSS tests with timecontrol "10m+10s / game" >> >>Kurt Utzinger tests with timecontrol "40' / moves" >> >>Here: >> >>Hiarcs 10 won one match and loses 3 matches >>(against Rybka, Toga II (!), and against Fritz 9) >> >>31,0-19,0 (62 %) vs Shredder 9 UCI >> >>22,5-27,5 (45 %) vs Fritz 9 >>21,0-29,0 (42 %) vs Toga II 1.1. >>16,0-34,0 (32 %) vs Rybka 1.0. Beta 32-bit >> >>Rating list 5moves/Nunn2 40'/40: >> >>http://www.utzingerk.com/rating_list.htm >> >>That is an serious Rating-list! >> >>ED: > > >Hi Eduard, > >I don't think it's fair to discredit a work in progress. ALL rating lists will >have anomalies, but by studying them all, you get a generally consistent >picture. > >Regards, Graham. Dear Graham, this is my opinion and I say only my opinion! A List with timecontrol 10m + 10s is not a serious Rating List in my eyes. That I have not say only today, that is for a long time well-known, also that the Rating List of CSS and the BfF-List is not my Thing. Best, Eduard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.