Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 14:42:54 01/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2006 at 17:30:56, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On January 06, 2006 at 14:49:52, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>In our 5mvoes.ctg test 40'/40 over 50 games for each match >>the new Hiarcs 10 has lost its first three matches, won the >>match vs Shredder 9 but again lost its 5th match vs Fruit 2.2.1 >> >>Hiarcs 10 vs >> >>31,0-19,0 (62 %) vs Shredder 9 UCI > >>23,0-27,0 (46 %) vs Fruit 2.2.1 >>22,5-27,5 (45 %) vs Fritz 9 >>21,0-29,0 (42 %) vs Toga II 1.1. >>16,0-34,0 (32 %) vs Rybka 1.0. Beta 32-bit > >Against 5 best opponents of the World, Hiarcs 10 loses 4 Matches >and won only one against Shredder 9. That is not TOP in my eyes. It's on top 5! :-) But not on top 3 or top 2..... Of course all that are for Kurt's conditions of testing and for 50 games. If other conditions change or the number of games increases then it might even be first.... > >Then me interest only the matches of the best programs among themselves >(german: untereinander). Results against weaker engines from old times are for >me not also important more. > >This is _only_ my opinion, not a general fact! :-) > They are interesting for me, as it's always interesting to see an old King of computer Chess, for example Fritz 7, getting crushed by the new monsters even free ones!
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.