Author: Ingo Bauer
Date: 23:57:12 01/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2006 at 21:10:15, Sune Larsson wrote: >On January 06, 2006 at 18:43:32, Ingo Bauer wrote: > >>On January 06, 2006 at 18:09:02, Sune Larsson wrote: >> >>>I made a little hasty manouver when writing the previous message...;-) >>> >>>Took a swift look at this game - and it was an impressive win! Also this >>>variation is common in tournaments - NimzoIndian with 4.Qc2. I have to study >>>this game a little closer but it's a clear aspirant! >> >>It is a Nunn2 position till move 15. The game started at that point. >> >>Ingo > > >Is this really a Nunn2 position? I checked with my own Nunn2 suite and >the comments on Van Kempens site. Both gave a different move order and >endposition compared with yours. Namely: > >19 > > Opening 19 [E32] > >Nunn Test II London > > 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 0-0 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.Qxc3 b6 7.Bg5 Bb7 8.f3 h6 >9.Bh4 d5 10.e3 Nbd7 > > The Nimzo-Indian named after the strong player and theoretican Aaron >Nimzowitsch (his famous and instructive book dealing with chess strategy "My >System" I can highly recommend), some years ago had been in a crisis and a lot >of people stopped to defend this way with Black pieces, especially because of >the 4.Qc2 line giving Black some unpleasant positions. But as always seems to >happen with lines that were proved to be solid over decades, the specialists >detected new ways for Black to defend satisfactory again. You are right, this is not Nunn! It was played with the standard S9 classic book! Sorry for this little mistake but the game was not decided in the opening. I think it is worth something, nevertheless! Bye Ingo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.