Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why do some engines have learning capacity and others none?

Author: Sandro Necchi

Date: 00:46:22 01/07/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 06, 2006 at 10:40:56, Peter Skinner wrote:

>On January 06, 2006 at 06:31:53, Rex wrote:
>
>>As you meantioned "RESULT LEARNING" is also something over looked.  Rebel has
>>this and I feel also has some of the best position learning out there as an
>>option.
>
>Result learning is something that the Chessbase interface and Crafty do
>extremely well.
>
>Crafty goes as far as to use results in book creation and then tunes the book
>with result learning as games are played. If a certain line is played and loses
>a certain amount of times it is culled from the book.
>
>Chessbase also does this very well.
>
>You mention that Rebel has this and it is no surprise. Ed is and always was very
>forward thinking when he programmed. His learning schemes are very advanced.
>
>Peter

Ok, but the only program which used to remove and add moves to the book was
MChessPro from version 5 to above...

MChessPro did include also position learning.

Sandro



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.