Author: Tony Nichols
Date: 01:11:07 01/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2006 at 03:45:15, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >On January 06, 2006 at 08:53:19, Tony Nichols wrote: > >> >> I am interested in finding the strongest tactical engine for analysis. I don't >>care how strong it is in actual play. Any suggestions? >>Thanks >>Tony > >For pure material-only evaluation, Rybka WinFinder 1.0 in "naive" mode should be >an order of magnitude faster than any "real engine". > >Vas Thanks Vas, I was wondering about that. I read a post by Mig Greengard where he said that most strong players use engines to check tactics only. I am not a strong player but I think I could learn alot more if I wasn't engine dependant for positional evaluations. In that case I would just use the the best and fastest tactical engine. I'm waiting to buy Rybka when the full release is out. Will I still get Rybka Winfinder? Regards Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.