Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 01:12:18 01/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Eduard You are wrong in my opinion. The many rating lists are almos equal and there is indeed not much difference as far as the playing strength of Hiarcs 10 is concernded. Please have a look at the following URL and comparison: CSS Rating List: Hiarcs 10 = Rank 2 (but neither Rybka nor Toga are included) http://www.computerschach.de/index.php?option=com_wrapper&wrap=erangliste&Itemid=152 GS Rating List: Hiarcs 10 = Rank 3 http://www.pcschach.de/Texte/p3rating.html CEGT Rating List: Hiarcs 10 = Rank 5 http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/cegtrating4040pure.html Utzinger Rating List: Hiarcs 10 = Rank 5 http://www.utzingerk.com/rating_list.htm Michael's Rating List: Hiarcs 10 = Rank 6 http://chessengines.vs243093.vserver.de/turniere/blitzturniere/blitzrangliste.html Greetings Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.