Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 02:36:36 01/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2006 at 17:42:54, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On January 06, 2006 at 17:30:56, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On January 06, 2006 at 14:49:52, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>In our 5mvoes.ctg test 40'/40 over 50 games for each match >>>the new Hiarcs 10 has lost its first three matches, won the >>>match vs Shredder 9 but again lost its 5th match vs Fruit 2.2.1 >>> >>>Hiarcs 10 vs >>> >>>31,0-19,0 (62 %) vs Shredder 9 UCI >> >>>23,0-27,0 (46 %) vs Fruit 2.2.1 >>>22,5-27,5 (45 %) vs Fritz 9 >>>21,0-29,0 (42 %) vs Toga II 1.1. >>>16,0-34,0 (32 %) vs Rybka 1.0. Beta 32-bit >> >>Against 5 best opponents of the World, Hiarcs 10 loses 4 Matches >>and won only one against Shredder 9. That is not TOP in my eyes. > >It's on top 5! :-) >But not on top 3 or top 2..... I brand new new and a Program of the best, should beat the first 3 Engines from best 5, that only my opinion. Not everybody can purchase all 5 best Program of the world, in my cse max. 2!! OK? ED. > >Of course all that are for Kurt's conditions of testing and for 50 games. >If other conditions change or the number of games increases then it might even >be first.... > >> >>Then me interest only the matches of the best programs among themselves >>(german: untereinander). Results against weaker engines from old times are for >>me not also important more. >> >>This is _only_ my opinion, not a general fact! :-) >> > > They are interesting for me, as it's always interesting to see an old King of >computer Chess, for example Fritz 7, getting crushed by the new monsters even >free ones!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.