Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:04:15 01/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2006 at 07:14:43, Thorsten Czub wrote: >rybka has problems on CPU's such as Celeron with low mhz and blitz games. >here it is not doing enough NPS or search depth and the opponent profits. >giving the same engines more time or faster machine or cpu with bigger cache >rybka can again show its strength. > >rybka is the best example that it is NOT unimportant which machine or level or >book you use. i get e.g. very good results when using the junior book for rybka. > >rybka has also problems with togaII 1.1a. > >overall i would also say that rybka is in the moment the leading program. > >but concerning the order of s9, f9, fruit2.2.1 and others i am not conform with >some data that is presented. > > >from what i have hiarcs10 has no problems with f9 or s9 or fruit. >only with rybka. >and this can be fixed. it is no class difference but only a change of a few >switches and suddenly even rybka is in the same group. When you change parameters in Hiarcs and do not change parameters in rybka comparison is not fair. It seems that rybka slightly positional personality search direction is the best based on all tests that I read. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.