Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 06:34:53 01/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2006 at 08:04:15, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 07, 2006 at 07:14:43, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>rybka has problems on CPU's such as Celeron with low mhz and blitz games. >>here it is not doing enough NPS or search depth and the opponent profits. >>giving the same engines more time or faster machine or cpu with bigger cache >>rybka can again show its strength. >> >>rybka is the best example that it is NOT unimportant which machine or level or >>book you use. i get e.g. very good results when using the junior book for rybka. >> >>rybka has also problems with togaII 1.1a. >> >>overall i would also say that rybka is in the moment the leading program. >> >>but concerning the order of s9, f9, fruit2.2.1 and others i am not conform with >>some data that is presented. >> >> >>from what i have hiarcs10 has no problems with f9 or s9 or fruit. >>only with rybka. >>and this can be fixed. it is no class difference but only a change of a few >>switches and suddenly even rybka is in the same group. > >When you change parameters in Hiarcs and do not change parameters in rybka >comparison is not fair. > Correct....! The fact that there is a set of parameters different from default of Hiarcs10, that can beat Rybka, should not be used to show the Hiarcs 10 strength at general..... Perhaps Shredder 7.0 has a set of parameters that can beat Hiarcs10, another set that can beat Fritz9, etc, but overall it is much weaker than the todays top engines..... >It seems that rybka slightly positional personality search direction is the best >based on all tests that I read. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.