Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs 10 Test (40'/40) After 250 Games / Match vs Fruit 2.2.1

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 06:40:08 01/07/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 07, 2006 at 09:34:53, George Tsavdaris wrote:

>>When you change parameters in Hiarcs and do not change parameters in rybka
>>comparison is not fair.

chess strength is not about fairness.


>Correct....! The fact that there is a set of parameters different from default
>of Hiarcs10, that can beat Rybka, should not be used to show the Hiarcs 10
>strength at general.....

how do you know that the parameter switch isn't increasing strength in general
when you did not test it out ?
speculation ?! guessing ? astrology ?


>Perhaps Shredder 7.0 has a set of parameters that can


perhaps.
i am not talking about what COULD happen. i am talking about what my computers
played out.


>beat Hiarcs10, another set that can beat Fritz9, etc, but overall it is much
>weaker than the todays top engines.....

no.
the change in the style menue work against other programs too.
and even worse: default hiarcs is beating f9 and fruit and s9. only rybka not.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.