Author: Pedro Gomes
Date: 10:09:42 01/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2006 at 07:46:59, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>On January 07, 2006 at 07:39:20, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:
>
>>On January 07, 2006 at 06:58:55, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>Here You game:
>>>
>>>[Event "Test"]
>>>[Site "Markoff's home"]
>>>[White "Olenin Nickolai"]
>>>[Black "Rybka 1.01beta"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>
>>>{1MB, test.ctg, SSM1
>>>} 1. e4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} c5 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 2. Nf3 {
>>>[%emt 0:00:00]} Nc6 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 3. d4 {[%emt 0:00:05]} cxd4 {
>>>[%emt 0:00:00]} 4. Nxd4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 5. Nc3 {
>>>[%emt 0:00:04]} e5 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 6. Ndb5 {[%emt 0:00:11]} d6 {[%emt 0:00:00]
>>>} 7. Bg5 {[%emt 0:00:05]} a6 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 8. Na3 {[%emt 0:00:03]} b5 {
>>>[%emt 0:00:00]} 9. Nd5 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Be7 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 10. Bxf6 {
>>>[%emt 0:00:03]} Bxf6 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 11. c3 {[%emt 0:00:04]} Bg5 {
>>>[%emt 0:00:00]} 12. Nc2 {[%emt 0:00:06]} Rb8 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 13. Be2 {
>>>[%emt 0:00:04]} O-O {[%emt 0:00:00]} 14. O-O Be6 15. Qd3 f5 (15... g6) 16. Bf3
>>>Qd7 (16... g6 {[%emt 0:00:00]}) 17. exf5 Bxf5 18. Be4 h6 19. Rad1 Bg4 20. f3
>>>Be6 21. Ncb4 Nxb4 22. Nxb4 Rb6 23. Bd5 Bxd5 24. Nxd5 Rc6 25. Rfe1 Rcc8 26. Re4
>>>Qa7+ 27. Kh1 Qf2 28. Re2 Qc5 29. b3 Rf7 30. Re4 Qa3 31. Qe2 Kh8 32. Rg4 Qc5 33.
>>>Qc2 Rcf8 34. a4 Rd7 35. Rb4 Rb7 36. Qd3 Kg8 37. Ra1 Bd8 38. h3 Rff7 39. Kh2 h5
>>>40. axb5 a5 41. Rc4 Qxb5 42. b4 axb4 43. cxb4 Rb8 44. Nc3 Qb7 45. Rd1 Be7 46.
>>>Nd5 Bd8 47. Qg6 Qd7 48. Qxh5 Qa4 49. Rcc1 Qd7 50. Qg6 Rf5 51. Rc6 Qxc6 52. Qxf5
>>>Qe8 53. Rc1 Qf7 54. Qe4 Qe6 55. Qc4 Kf8 56. b5 Qd7 57. Rb1 Bb6 58. Qc6 Qd8 59.
>>>Rb4 Bc5 60. Rg4 Qc8 61. f4 e4 62. f5 e3 63. f6 gxf6 64. Rg8+ Kxg8 65. Ne7+ Kf8
>>>66. Nxc8 e2 67. Qe4 Rxc8 68. Qxe2 Bd4 69. h4 Be5+ 70. Kh3 f5 71. Qf2 Rc3+ 72.
>>>g3 Ke7 73. b6 Rb3 74. h5 Kf6 75. h6 Kg6 76. h7 Bg7 77. Kg2 Rb4 78. g4 Rxg4+ 79.
>>>Kh3 Rb4 80. b7 Be5 81. Qa2 Rxb7 82. Qg2+ Kxh7 83. Qxb7+ Kg6 84. Qd7 Kg5 85. Kg2
>>>Kf4 86. Kf2 Bd4+ 87. Ke2 Bc5 88. Kd3 Kg5 89. Qg7+ Kf4 90. Qg6 Ke5 91. Qe8+ Kf6
>>>92. Ke2 f4 93. Kf3 Be3 94. Ke4 Bc5 95. Kxf4 Bb6 96. Qf8+ Ke6 97. Qf5+ *
>>>
>>>Here You comment:
>>>
>>>"Look at variations. There are a lot that can be improved in strategy. Classical
>>>theme with d6 square."
>>>
>>>Sergei, why plays not YOUR band new SmarThink 1.00?
>>>
>>>Why Rybka, have you nothing another Things to do?
>>>
>>>Sprachlos,
>>>ED.
>>>
>>>
>>>On January 07, 2006 at 06:53:50, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>
>>>>Sorry I see that Markoff play this game "home" with an IM against Rybka. Ok, no
>>>>ICC but "home" is here much better now for my questions!
>>>>
>>>>On January 07, 2006 at 06:40:10, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Translate in english:
>>>>>
>>>>>In this Posting
>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?477147
>>>>>
>>>>>I see that Sergei Markoff, programmer von SmarThink, a game of Rybka on ICC
>>>>>postet. From Vasik Rajlich I see in addition no comment. Two questions in
>>>>>addition therefore:
>>>>>
>>>>>1. Why does it interest Sergei Markoff off such as Rybka on ICC plays (it
>>>>>played there with Rybka?) doesn't a programmer have to do really better than
>>>>>programs of others to test? Why doesn't it play better with its own program on
>>>>>ICC, since would be nevertheless more meaningfully, or?
>>>>>
>>>>>2. Why doesn't Vasik Rajlich write his statement to this game on ICC? Here the
>>>>>Thread:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?477147
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>My Original German Message:
>>>>>
>>>>>In diesem Posting
>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?477147
>>>>>
>>>>>sehe ich dass Sergei Markoff, Programmierer von SmarThink, eine Partie von Rybka
>>>>>auf ICC postet. Von Vasik Rajlich sehe ich dazu keinen Kommentar.
>>>>>
>>>>>Zwei Fragen dazu deshalb:
>>>>>
>>>>>1. Warum interessiert es Sergei Markoff wie Rybka auf ICC spielt (spielte er
>>>>>selbst mit Rybka dort?) ? Hat denn ein Programmierer wirklich nicht Besseres zu
>>>>>tun als Programme anderer zu testen? Warum spielt er nicht besser mit seinem
>>>>>eigenen Programm auf ICC, da wäre doch sinnvoller, oder?
>>>>>
>>>>>2. Warum nimmt Vasik Rajlich keine Stellungsnahme zu der Partie auf ICC?
>>>>>
>>>>>Hier der Thread:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?477147
>>>>>
>>>>>:(
>>>>>
>>>>>ED.
>>
>>
>>
>>Oh, come on, Eduard, this game's not that important :-). The problem in this
>>game, from my point of view, was the inferior line that Rybka played starting
>>with 15...f5?, instead of playing the active 15...a5! that would make Mr. Olenin
>>feel quite ill-at-ease. The book that Rybka used was apparently mediocre, to
>>say the least. The Sicilian Pelikan has to be played actively by black,
>>otherwise black is in for a thrashing.
>>
>>No need to spoil your mood, dear Eduard... A sports page in a newspaper might
>>really be the way to go :-)
>>
>>Djordje
>
>
>I English not good and breakfast my mood. You I ask my egg was 17'. It hard can
>tell. What say you? I not.
>
>:)
>
>
>I Rony
My dear pope Rolf,
Mother Teresa said that you are not only inteligent, but also witty.
Waithing for you next door, at CTF.
Dr Pedro Jung
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.