Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 10:27:18 01/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2006 at 14:10:41, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On January 06, 2006 at 13:50:11, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On January 06, 2006 at 06:07:09, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>On January 05, 2006 at 19:53:06, enrico carrisco wrote: >>> >>>>The CSS Rating List is complete and available at the link below. I've >>>>translated the German introduction to english -- but be aware: I am not a >>>>native German speaker and there could be some slight mistakes. Overall, the >>>>message should be very close. >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>> >>>>-elc. >>>> >>>> >>>>Link: >>>>http://www.computerschach.de/index.php?option=com_wrapper&wrap=Rangliste&Itemid=127 >>> >>>Reason: CSS tests with timecontrol "10m+10s / game" >>> >>>Kurt Utzinger tests with timecontrol "40' / moves" >>> >>>Here: >>> >>>Hiarcs 10 won one match and loses 3 matches >>>(against Rybka, Toga II (!), and against Fritz 9) >>> >>>31,0-19,0 (62 %) vs Shredder 9 UCI >>> >>>22,5-27,5 (45 %) vs Fritz 9 >>>21,0-29,0 (42 %) vs Toga II 1.1. >>>16,0-34,0 (32 %) vs Rybka 1.0. Beta 32-bit >>> >>>Rating list 5moves/Nunn2 40'/40: >>> >>>http://www.utzingerk.com/rating_list.htm >>> >>>That is an serious Rating-list! >>> >>>ED: >> >> >>Hi Eduard, >> >>I don't think it's fair to discredit a work in progress. ALL rating lists will >>have anomalies, but by studying them all, you get a generally consistent >>picture. >> >>Regards, Graham. > >Dear Graham, > >this is my opinion and I say only my opinion! A List with timecontrol 10m + 10s >is not a serious Rating List in my eyes. > >That I have not say only today, that is for a long time well-known, also that >the Rating List of CSS and the BfF-List is not my Thing. > >Best, >Eduard. Read here: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?477576 Or did your english just selectively go away again? -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.