Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: My last - 2 -

Author: Eduard Nemeth

Date: 10:48:02 01/07/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 07, 2006 at 13:38:37, Eduard Nemeth wrote:

>On January 07, 2006 at 13:17:57, Sune Larsson wrote:
>
>>On January 07, 2006 at 12:41:51, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>Dir auf deutsch ganz kurz:
>>>
>>>Weil ich wegen dieser Partien (vor allem wegen der gegen Deep Junior) als
>>>angebnich Anti-Hiarcs-Anmacher abgestempelt wurde.
>>>
>>>Das aber lasse ich mir nicht gefallen, denn ich kann Partien posten die ich
>>>will, solange diese Partien echt sind!
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Ausserdem möchte ich, und dass ist das Wichtigste, mit den Partien zum Ausdruck
>>>bringen dass mich H10 bisher nicht beglückt hat!
>>
>>
>>   If I read you correctly, it's very important for you to show the games
>>   with Hiarcs 10 - in which you were not satisfied with the play by H10.
>
>Sune,
>
>my english is very bad. In german I can all much better says. In 2004 I have
>tested Hiarcs for Palm on a Zire. I was very surprised about the strenght!
>
>In the Palm was a Palm Tiger too, and an Genius.
>
>But Hiarcs was real the best program with an nice playing style!!
>
>In this time I was belighted from the Palm Hiarcs and I make an Hiarcs Fan
>Page!!
>
>But my wish was, that Hiarcs 10 play this style like Palm Hiarcs!
>
>That was the reason why I studied the games of Hiarcs Beta for PC. But the
>Hiarcs for PC play not this style like Palm Hiarcs, when I see all the games
>in the beta test time (only few games on CSS Online Masters) an only few games
>on Playchess.
>
>The style is not good in my eyes and the resuld too.
>
>I post this games (was not blitz).
>
>Sorry but my english is bad and it is hard for me, to write further about this
>topic.
>
>Sorry,
>Eduard.
>
>Your point 2. I do not understand, sorry.
>
>>
>>   If so, I can think of two ways to go: 1) Post the relevant games here
>>   with your comments that pin points the flaws you find in the play of H10.
>>   2) Mail these games with your comments to the author of the engine.

Sune,
now I understand Your point 1. and 2.

1. Ok I can comment the games but I am not a beta tester of Hiarcs, why sshould
I do it when I have not an Hiarcs 10? The Autor should me give his last beta,
the I will gladly comment this games.

2. Or post him (Mark Uniacke) my impressions of the new Hiarcs 10 X.

On the other Hand, Mark Uniacke have his beta testers (Thorsten Czub is one too)
and this testers know more then I.

>>   I think both ways might work in a productive way.

If Mark is interesting that I help him make Hiarcs stronger, also should he send
me a Beta-Engine to test.

I am Free! :-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.