Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 12:43:25 01/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2006 at 15:12:15, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 07, 2006 at 11:22:14, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On January 07, 2006 at 11:15:31, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>you are not interested in the content. >>>you are interested in talking about what could have happened or did not happen. >>> >>>i am talking about what the machines play out. >>> >>>and why it happens. >>> >>>any chess program that comes out on the market has a few parameters and the >>>program gets tuned to the best before the relase. >> >> But you are saying that the default is not the best, as there are settings that >>would make it suddenly and easily going to the top along with Rybka. Now you say >>that it has been tuned to be the best. I'm confused.....?!?!? >> >>> >>>even rybka has some switches the programmer is not 100% sure about. >> >>Unfortunatelly you didn't answer any of my questions...... >> >>So what are these settings you think that would put Hiarcs 10 _easily_ near >>Rybka....? I remember you posting it somewhere but i can't find it now..... > >As far as I remmeber thorsten used aggresive and hypermodern for hiarcs. > >Uri Also, see: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?477578 Adding Threat Depth 5 with Hypermodern + Aggressive is being praised by some. Saluti, -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.