Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:03:24 01/08/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2006 at 02:41:17, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On January 07, 2006 at 19:09:30, robert flesher wrote: > >>TINCAN, Blitz:30' 0 >> >> 123456789012345678 >>1 Hiarcs 10 0001111½½½½1111½11 12.5/18 >>2 Rybka 1.01 Beta 7 32-bit 1110000½½½½0000½00 5.5/18 >> >>I will of course play many more games, although there is no doubt the default >>settings + aggressive + threat depth 5 + combinations + hypermodern is much >>stronger at least in engine vs engine games(IMHO). Test for yourself and I think >>you will be pleased, and eventually come to the same conclusion. Cheers, Robert. > > Hi Robert > Now I am confused. When we spoke the last time about modified > settings you mentioned default + aggressive + threat depth 5 > + hypermodern [http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?477578] > and I have in the meantime made some not very successful tests > with this setting. But now you add + combinations and this may of > course have an important influence. What shall I - if at all - test > with Hiarcs 10. > Best regards > Kurt I do not know and I still wait to read about results of hiarcs10 against engines with known rating. Rybka 1.01 Beta 7 32-bit is not engine with known rating and may have bugs. I think that it may be better to test Hiarcs10 against Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit SP Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.