Author: George Sobala
Date: 11:05:15 01/08/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2006 at 10:18:18, enrico carrisco wrote: >On January 08, 2006 at 05:08:32, George Sobala wrote: > >>On January 08, 2006 at 04:03:24, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On January 08, 2006 at 02:41:17, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>On January 07, 2006 at 19:09:30, robert flesher wrote: >>>> >>>>>TINCAN, Blitz:30' 0 >>>>> >>>>> 123456789012345678 >>>>>1 Hiarcs 10 0001111½½½½1111½11 12.5/18 >>>>>2 Rybka 1.01 Beta 7 32-bit 1110000½½½½0000½00 5.5/18 >>>>> >>>>>I will of course play many more games, although there is no doubt the default >>>>>settings + aggressive + threat depth 5 + combinations + hypermodern is much >>>>>stronger at least in engine vs engine games(IMHO). Test for yourself and I think >>>>>you will be pleased, and eventually come to the same conclusion. Cheers, Robert. >>>> >>>> Hi Robert >>>> Now I am confused. When we spoke the last time about modified >>>> settings you mentioned default + aggressive + threat depth 5 >>>> + hypermodern [http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?477578] >>>> and I have in the meantime made some not very successful tests >>>> with this setting. But now you add + combinations and this may of >>>> course have an important influence. What shall I - if at all - test >>>> with Hiarcs 10. >>>> Best regards >>>> Kurt >>> >>>I do not know and I still wait to read about results of hiarcs10 against >>>engines with known rating. >>> >>>Rybka 1.01 Beta 7 32-bit is not engine with known rating and may have bugs. >>> >>>I think that it may be better to test Hiarcs10 against Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit SP >>> >>>Uri >> >>I have just finished 120 games at %+1 and 3+1 time controls of Hiatcs10 >>hypermodern, aggressive, Threat depth=5 against Deep Shredder (2 threads) : >> >>BayesELO >>ResultSet-EloRating>ratings >>Rank Name Elo + - games score draws >> 1 DeepShredder9 2740 27 26 120 62% 33% >> 2 Hiarcs10 2660 26 27 120 38% 33% >>ResultSet-EloRating>details >> 1 DeepShredder9 2740 120.0 ( 74.5 : 45.5) >> 120.0 ( 74.5 : 45.5) Hiarcs10 2660 >> 2 Hiarcs10 2660 120.0 ( 45.5 : 74.5) >> 120.0 ( 45.5 : 74.5) DeepShredder9 2740 > >Hello, > >Apparently he forgot to mention combinations turned on as well. > >-elc. I had tried +combinations -futility earlier and was not too impressed with that. But I will try just +combinations, certainly.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.