Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 12:05:40 01/09/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2006 at 14:50:02, Majd Al-Ansari wrote: >On January 09, 2006 at 09:32:50, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>go on with your examples. You are the only one going into chess. But what could >>you prove? That Vasik could make Rybka stronger? That with book is stronger? >>Isnt this self-evident? > > >I have no clue what your ramblings are about. I am not trying to prove anything >... only showing the strengths and weaknesses of Rybka. And yes I am "only >going into chess" since I thought this is what it is all about ... CHESS. If >you find my post useless or even offensive then why not skip it ... it will >cause you much less heartburn. perhaps I missed it. I wanted to say go on with chess examples because you are one of very few who do tht - and because it's what it's all about: CHESS! I only asked because Rybka is just in making. Many of these weaknesses will be corrected. These weaknesses are well known. But that doesnt mean that your examples with details are nonsense. I ask you why you attack me in response if you have no clue what I could have meant... My point about the setting problem and these tests is not rambling and I dont lose heartburn either. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.