Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: not correct information in fruit's site

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 12:34:38 01/09/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 09, 2006 at 15:23:55, Albert Silver wrote:

>On January 09, 2006 at 15:09:13, Gabor Szots wrote:
>
>>On January 09, 2006 at 12:33:44, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.fruitchess.com/playing-strength.htm
>>>
>>>Fruit 2.2 is leading most of the current rating lists and is right now probably
>>>the strongest chess engine in the world on a standard single-processor PC.
>>
>>They say "probably". "Most" is perhaps a bit out of date but there has not been
>>any Rybka release yet other than betas.
>>
>>>
>>>It was correct 2 months ago but it is not correct now.
>>
>>How can you know? Fruit may have a stronger version than Rybka is now. And you
>>yourself said once (at least I remember so) that Fabian is capable of improving
>>it yet 100 Elo stronger. Rybka will then be only No.2.
>>
>>Also don't forget that it takes time to make it to the rating lists. They cannot
>>be strictly up-to-date.
>
>In which case the information stating it is leading most of the rating lists is
>correct. It IS leading the SSDF, and it IS leading CSS. These and CEGT are the
>most commonly referred to.

It also leads WBEC, which is on par with CEGT for popularity.

>                                      Albert
>
>
>>>I wonder if there is going to be released an update for fruit in order to make
>>>it correct again(for next fruit) or if material from the fruit site is going to
>>>be deleted in order to make the site correct again.
>>>
>>>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.