Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:36:35 01/09/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2006 at 15:30:09, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 09, 2006 at 15:21:33, Franz Hagra wrote: > >>>Why is it funny that it leads CSS? >> >>because Rybka will not be tested until the final release! > >That is a very reasonable policy. It would be annoying to perform 300 games at >some reasaonable time control and then have the results immediately invalidated. > >It is very sensible to wait until the program is ready. A high quality, >debugged book and learning for positions and book values would be important for >such a list in order to compete with programs like Shredder properly. I believe that the CSS unlike the ssdf do not test with public books but from predefined positions. Of course it is very logical to wait to Rybka1.2 but the reason is not waiting for book and learning. The reason is that they can test limited number of programs in the next months and it is better if they test other things and not only rybka versions. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.