Author: Gabor Szots
Date: 12:48:33 01/09/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2006 at 15:41:27, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 09, 2006 at 15:33:33, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On January 09, 2006 at 15:29:58, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On January 09, 2006 at 15:14:29, Gabor Szots wrote: >>> >>>>On January 09, 2006 at 14:45:01, Austin A. Biberink wrote: >>>> >>>>When Rybka was first announced the author said "its strength is 90-150 Elo above >>>>Shredder". The rating lists say otherwise, but you never demanded to correct >>>>that lie. >>> >>> >>>The rating list do not say different things >>> >>>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/cegtrating4040all.html >>> >>>2 Rybka 1.0 Beta 64-bit 2857 >>>13 Shredder 9 2756 >>> >>>You can see 101 elo difference. >>>90<101<150 >> >>I guess that .001% of the PCs have 64 bit Windows. So that measurement is >>probably not too useful for them. > >I agree but the claim that rybka is 90-150 elo stronger was not a lie because it >was not claimed specifically about the 32 bit version and people who downloaded >rybka or bought it could see that there is 64 bit version even if they could not >use it. > >Uri And Shredder has SMP version but I believe that in the comparison the 1-CPU version was used. The SMP version would put the difference under 90, that's sure. Gábor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.