Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:12:55 01/09/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2006 at 05:45:18, Henrik Dinesen wrote: >On January 06, 2006 at 18:05:18, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On January 06, 2006 at 16:50:38, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On January 06, 2006 at 13:57:23, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On January 06, 2006 at 12:29:45, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>Rybka site now shows the release of Rybka 1.1 as January 12. Very disappointing >>>>>to me. >>>> >>>>Not to me. I am waiting to buy the professional version until all the dust >>>>settles. I would much rather have them work the kinks out carefully than rush >>>>it. >>> >>>"the professional version" ? >>>This is the professional version paid for in advance. >> >>Right. I don't usually buy version 1.0 of anything. I wait a bit and then buy >>it. I don't like to reinstall updates a half dozen times. I'm lazy like that. > > >I can follow that, but... In the meantime my UCI folder is getting stuffed with >various Rybka's! After all, in this case we're only talking engines, not huge >setup's. I have the free beta. What will be gained by installing a half dozen betas? Once all the bugs have been worked out, I will buy the professional version. In the meantime, I have a very strong analysis tool. I bought Fruit right away, because I was very familiar with the quality of the code. The same goes for Deep Sjeng.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.