Author: blass uri
Date: 10:02:38 04/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 1999 at 12:06:09, Dann Corbit wrote: >I pounded the stuffings out of it last night with this result: > >r1r2k2/1p4pQ/1n1bp2p/p2n1p2/P2P2Nq/1B5P/1P3PP1/R1BR2K1 w - f6 acd 16; acn >-1574737862; acs 43201; ce 43; pv Re1 fxg4 Rxe6 gxh3 Qf5+ Nf6 Rxd6 hxg2 Kxg2 Nc4 >Bf4 Qg4+ Qxg4 Nxg4 Rg6 h5 Rh1 Nf6 Bg5 Kf7; > >It is interesting to me that even after 12 hours on a PII 350Mhz machine, no big >payoff seems to be visible. Positions like this, where the computer makes a >good choice but the payoff is not visible yet (we would hardly be going bonkers >over 2/5 of a pawn) seem to me like "accidental" solutions. Unless the ce >reflects the true value of the situation, it only means that the position did >not happen to look worse than the others and accidentally settled on the right >move. > >I would go as far as to say that we have not really found the solution yet, even >though the right move was chosen. > >My question, "Does anyone have a centipawn evaluation that reflects a winning >advantage?" Junior5.3 showed after 25 minutes Re1 fxg4 Rxe6 gxh3 Rg6 It did not show a winning advantage but after following this line I found a winning advantage for white. I gave Junior5.3 the position after Re1 fxg4 Rxe6. gxh3 is a mistake and Junior5.3 after some hours prefered Rc6 for black with only 1.0x pawn advantage for white (I do not remember x) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.