Author: Arnold Gove
Date: 05:36:08 01/10/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2006 at 07:40:56, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 10, 2006 at 07:09:36, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>One shouldnt buy Fritz 9 as a chessplayer because testers have certain problems >>in engine vs engine autoplaying? Give me break! > > >again your comments show that you have NO understanding about computerchess and >the programs. if you would EVER have had a fritz program, you would know exactly >that the program evaluates in positions he has no idea about arround 0.00 and >that these 0.00 can be 4 or 5 moves and that mainly in these stages the game >turns arround. while the opponent sees and recognizes that the Fritz moves are >"nullmoves" (meaning here: weak moves, not the best moves, no plan moves) >and increases its score, fritz sees nothing. > >then suddenly fritz gets the fail low and NOW it sees the mess. too late. > > >THIS was the major information WHY fritz9 is IMO not a tool for analysis. > Interesting. Please show us a couple of positions in which Fritz "has no idea" and displays a 0.00 evaluation. Thanks. AG
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.