Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 05:49:57 01/10/06
Go up one level in this thread
I want to give to other things to consider: 1. Maybe Rybka various beta releases used for this tests are quite variable in strength. Matches Hiarcs10 - Fruit2.2.1 are generally much more close and equal. 2. All these matches with about 30-40 games are heavily influenced by statistics. Not enough games to give a clear picture. Maybe after 1000 games the results would be much closer. regards Andy On January 10, 2006 at 05:26:59, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >I simply do not know what to make of hiarcs. sometimes it seems to get killed by >rybka (see post two lines earlier). Sometimes it seems to win. > >usually, it seems that engines maintain there relative order fairly well across >machines, testing conditions, and time controls (excluding very short time >controls) > >hiarcs seems to be quite variable. What the heck is going on???? > > >On January 09, 2006 at 19:40:31, robert flesher wrote: > >>TINCAN, Blitz:30' 0 >> >> >>1 Hiarcs 10 +14/-6/=16 61.11 22.0/36 >>2 Rybka 1.01 Beta 7 32-bit +6/-14/=16 38.89 14.0/36 >> >>If anyone wants the latest games tell me.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.