Author: Henrik Dinesen
Date: 06:15:08 01/10/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2006 at 08:48:42, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 10, 2006 at 06:57:21, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 10, 2006 at 06:35:04, Pro Deo wrote: >> >>>Hi ! >>>For GUI features of course . >>>Regards >> >>ok so why fritz and not Hiarcs? >>Hiarcs also comes with the same gui and is of similiar strength to Fritz. >> >>Uri > >Marketing. Chessbase invested in Fritz as a brand-name. I'm not saying that >Fritz hasn't been a top program, but the main reason is marketing. Even now, one >would more often see Hiarcs 10 described as coming in the "Fritz" GUI, and not >the CB playing GUI. > > Albert True. If people are a little bit "outside", they can easly mistake the CB GUI with Chessbase (the program), and chessprogramX.exe could to some be the same as Chesspartner or ChessAssistant, not to mention the concept of engines & GUI's. ChessBase (GmBh) has made it difficult to separate the concepts, and especially to describe them. Is that good marketing? Bla-bla Regards :) Henrik
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.