Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:18:01 01/10/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2006 at 08:54:56, Albert Silver wrote:
>On January 09, 2006 at 19:40:31, robert flesher wrote:
>
>>TINCAN, Blitz:30' 0
>>
>>
>>1 Hiarcs 10 +14/-6/=16 61.11 22.0/36
>>2 Rybka 1.01 Beta 7 32-bit +6/-14/=16 38.89 14.0/36
>>
>>If anyone wants the latest games tell me.
>
>I never tested Beta 7 so cannot comment. However, I have been testing Beta 9,
>using the Noomen Select positions, and it says a lot about needing lots of
>games. After 35 games, Fruit 2.2 was LEADING 18-17. There are 40 Noomen
>positions, which means 80 games BTW. Anyhow, the gauntlet is just about
>finishing, and Rybka is leading by no less than 45.5 - 32.5! Actually, this
>should be of direct interest to Noomen himself or any bookmakers, since the
>series may reveal openings that Rybka is particularly suited or unsuited for.
>
> Albert
Here is the partial result after 35 games:
Noomen-RybkaB9Neutral-Fruit22 2006
1 Fruit 2.2 2850 +59 +12/-11/=12 51.43 18.0/35
2 Rybka 1.01 Beta 9 32-bit 2900 -59 +11/-12/=12 48.57 17.0/35
Note that this was the result after the frist day of testing, and was what I
reported to Vasik. I gave Fruit a rating of 2850 based on the latest SSDF list,
and as you can see, it was scoring 9 Elo points better than Rybka after 35
games.
Here is the final result after all 80 games:
Noomen-RybkaB9Neutral-Fruit22 2006
1 Rybka 1.01 Beta 9 32-bit 2900 +6 +34/-21/=25 58.13 46.5/80
2 Fruit 2.2 2850 -6 +21/-34/=25 41.88 33.5/80
Now it is Rybka scoring 56 Elo points better than Fruit 2.2.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.