Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:28:49 01/10/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2006 at 16:16:29, James Conda wrote: > > I only use Fritz 9 for game analysis. > Perhaps a more correct analysis may be acheived using an engine with a > style different to F9 in combination with F9. > Which current engine's style is different to F9? Most engines give different opinions from time to time. Rybka can solve problems that other engines cannot solve, but the same is true for others as well. If you have a position with wall formations (ala WAC.230) then Crafty 19.x is a good one to try (compiled with DETECTDRAW). If you try a dozen top engines you will get more than one opinion about the best move (unless it's a no-brainer). > What do you find the best method of game analysis. Move by move from the first point of interest (sometimes less one) at an hour per position or longer. I usually let several engines chew on it as well.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.