Author: blass uri
Date: 13:31:33 04/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 1999 at 14:30:31, Paulo Soares wrote: >On April 02, 1999 at 13:29:41, blass uri wrote: > >>I think that a team human+ program can be better then the program but the >>question is what is the result in a match between program+human against a >>program. >> >> >>a)Did humans try to do a match between themselves with the help of one program >>against another program or against the same program. >> >>The program without help of a human may use faster hardware to do the match >>interesting. >> >>b)what is the result in a match between the team programmer+his(her) program and >>the same program >> >>Did some programmer try it? >> >>Uri > >Uri, > >1. Which time control? >2. Which average rating of the team >he/she? >3. What system? It depends on the decision of the player. I asked if someone has experience with it and what are the results. > >For a time 40/2, I think that the greater player >rating of the team he/she must be around 2400, >for a PII-200Mz HT=64. I think that a team of human+computer can do better result than computer without help also for humans with lower rating. I know that computers do some mistakes that even 2000 players usually do not do. I believe that by playing only 90-95% of the moves of the computer humans with rating close to 2000 can do a better team. I think that humans know better than computers when to think more and when to think less so by using the infinite level and telling the computer to play now humans can improve the performance of the program. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.