Author: James Conda
Date: 15:34:26 01/10/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2006 at 18:19:56, Christos Gitsis wrote:
>On January 10, 2006 at 16:16:29, James Conda wrote:
>
>>
>> I only use Fritz 9 for game analysis.
>> Perhaps a more correct analysis may be acheived using an engine with a
>> style different to F9 in combination with F9.
>> Which current engine's style is different to F9?
>
>Toga is approximately of the same strength as Fritz 9, and it is free.
>
>>
>> What do you find the best method of game analysis.
>
>This depends on how strong a player you are.
>
>If you are a club player, I would suggest that you analyze the entire game at 1
>minute/move (even 30 sec/move would suffice if you are hasty). This will catch
>most of your mistakes, which you can try to correct. Perhaps the program will
>miss the best move in some cases, but this is not very important (in my humble
>opinion) because these will be really difficult positions.
>
>However, if you want to find the absolute truth about every position, you have
>to get the best programs, let them analyze for longer time periods, and also
>play out the variations they suggest and analyze more deeply the ones you think
>are interesting.
>
>Regards,
> Christos,
Thank you very much.Your comments are well
presented and very clear.I agree with you.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.