Author: David Dahlem
Date: 07:06:24 01/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2006 at 07:14:50, Jouni Uski wrote: >Hi, > >For curiosity I run WinFinder in 52 mostly quite hard tactical positions >(private): > > Fritz 9 Rybka Rybka WinFinder > > 0:10:00 0:00:16 0:00:07 > 0:00:02 0:03:17 0:10:00 > 0:10:00 0:08:05 0:03:52 > 0:10:00 0:10:00 0:10:00 > 0:00:12 0:00:22 0:00:14 > 0:01:01 0:01:21 0:00:19 > 0:10:00 0:10:00 0:10:00 > 0:07:16 0:10:00 0:01:07 > 0:03:20 0:00:19 0:10:00 > 0:00:13 0:09:12 0:00:26 > 0:00:03 0:01:48 0:10:00 > 0:09:43 0:10:00 0:05:51 > 0:00:24 0:00:48 0:00:20 > 0:00:08 0:00:10 0:00:08 > 0:00:01 0:01:05 0:10:00 > 0:04:05 0:06:25 0:01:59 > 0:00:05 0:02:10 0:08:29 > 0:00:01 0:00:00 0:00:01 > 0:00:04 0:00:05 0:00:05 > 0:00:02 0:00:02 0:00:03 > 0:00:32 0:10:00 0:01:43 > 0:00:46 0:10:00 0:10:00 > 0:00:01 0:00:49 0:03:10 > 0:07:35 0:06:02 0:10:00 > 0:00:01 0:00:32 0:00:26 > 0:00:07 0:00:14 0:00:32 > 0:00:01 0:10:00 0:10:00 > 0:00:26 0:03:51 0:01:02 > 0:01:33 0:00:07 0:00:04 > 0:00:07 0:00:58 0:00:08 > 0:00:11 0:00:07 0:00:03 > 0:00:41 0:09:39 0:10:00 > 0:00:03 0:10:00 0:00:41 > 0:00:04 0:08:07 0:01:48 > 0:04:57 0:07:11 0:06:56 > 0:10:00 0:10:00 0:10:00 > 0:00:05 0:00:17 0:00:16 > 0:00:01 0:00:16 0:00:01 > 0:00:16 0:03:52 0:00:18 > 0:00:10 0:00:55 0:00:25 > 0:00:01 0:00:01 0:00:02 > 0:00:01 0:00:07 0:00:11 > 0:01:06 0:00:31 0:00:29 > 0:00:26 0:01:43 0:00:41 > 0:10:00 0:00:16 0:00:15 > 0:00:20 0:00:02 0:00:03 > 0:00:33 0:10:00 0:01:23 > 0:00:14 0:00:04 0:00:36 > 0:10:00 0:10:00 0:10:00 > 0:10:00 0:10:00 0:02:10 > 0:03:17 0:04:07 0:10:00 > 0:00:02 0:00:02 0:10:00 > >Total time: 1:30:16 2:05:15 1:86:26 >Total solved: 44 40 38 > >I used default settings. I think WinFinder needs a lot improvements, because >Fritz 9 is faster in default mode. > >" It can spot and evaluate long, complex tactical variations much faster than >the normal Rybka engine" says WinFinder readme. Not quite... > >Jouni The WinFinder readme also says "In many tactical testsuites, the so-called "solution" is not actually that much better than the alternatives. It is common for engines to "solve" such problems by reporting the move as best. In fact, such test problems favor engines which frequently change their minds - by jumping from one best move to another, such engines are more likely to eventually land on the right move." Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.