Author: ERIQ
Date: 07:30:27 01/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2006 at 09:27:57, Russell wrote:
>On January 11, 2006 at 00:45:20, ERIQ wrote:
>
>>On January 10, 2006 at 22:18:50, Russell wrote:
>>
>>> {
>>>>4.06/12 4} 70. Kg7 {4.43/11 6} Nd7 {5.59/14 12} 71. Qe6 {4.47/12 9} Qa4 {
>>>>5.83/13 4} 72. Bg5 {(Kf7) 5.14/11 5} Qd4+ {(Kb7) 5.83/13 6} 73. f6 {5.38/12 4}
>>>>Kb7 {6.22/14 5} 74. Be3 {5.76/11 4} Qd3 {6.15/13 6} 75. f7 {(Bf2) 5.92/12 4}
>>>>Qc3+ {6.54/13 4} 76. Kg8 {6.46/11 3} Qc8+ {6.58/13 3} 77. Qe8 {6.80/12 3} Qc6 {
>>>>6.79/14 4} 78. f8=Q {6.80/11 4} 1-0
>>>
>>>I Checked up on that Czub settings honestly, I am truly not impressed with even
>>>the modified settings of Hiarcs 10.
>>
>>So what! are you a GM??
>>Can you beat it? I personally don't know any that can in a 4 game match at
>>40/120! And I know a few GMs to include yasser, but even he would not stand a
>>chance in a match with that monster. What I'm trying to say is, who cares if it
>>isn't the strongest engine it is still more than a match for any human. I would
>>be willing to bet $5000 us. that if it could play in a double RR w/ the ten best
>>humans at 40/120 it would place in the top 2.
>>
>>The Whole Engine didnt worked out to be as I
>>>thought. It is stronger than Shredder however, and could be close to Fruit and
>>>Fritz but not stronger and Rybka is in another league even the 32-bit.
>
>Nope, Im not a GM. I was meaning this to be in a engine-engine match. I didnt
>say anything about Human vs Hiarcs 10.
ok, but hiarcs seems to be anti human more than anti comp by design.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.