Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:51:32 01/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2006 at 10:24:43, stuart taylor wrote:
>On January 11, 2006 at 10:12:33, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On January 11, 2006 at 10:03:05, stuart taylor wrote:
>>
>>>On January 11, 2006 at 08:45:27, Albert Silver wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 11, 2006 at 08:32:57, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On January 11, 2006 at 07:43:15, gerold daniels wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On January 11, 2006 at 04:40:02, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On January 11, 2006 at 03:25:23, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>ryan, would you guess at how much stronger the next fruit will be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>best
>>>>>>>>J
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Guess? My "guess" is that Rybka will remain on top, because A. Steen says that
>>>>>>>Fruit was still not as knowledgable as Fritz or Shredder, even when it was top,
>>>>>>>but Rybka DID do the trick, and played better chess (in his expert extimation)
>>>>>>>than all of them.
>>>>>>>Therefore, I havn't seen something which looked more promissing than Rybka, and,
>>>>>>>Rybka isn't finished for this year yet, either, and it might even continue
>>>>>>>updating throught the year, if need be.
>>>>>>>Shredder, we are waiting for now, and I think they are still ambitious to be on
>>>>>>>top, and we'll soon see if they were able to know how to do it.
>>>>>>>Junior we are also waiting for, perhaps.
>>>>>>>Hiarcs has already done its job, probably till next December or so.
>>>>>>>And there may be others. But so far, it looks like Rybka is the star.
>>>>>>>S.Taylor
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hello Taylor. Rybka does look very good. However Fruit has some very good
>>>>>>programers like Ryan working to improve it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Gerold.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>P.S. Who is Steen.Can he really pick a good lottery number.
>>>>>
>>>>>Steen is someone else, who is quite well known in the chess world.
>>>>
>>>>Well-known to who? His buddies at the chess club?
>>>>
>>>
>>>A little bit more than that! (but I don't know if I have permission to say).
>>>S.T.
>>
>>The general consensus was that he was a fraud,
>
>I shouldn't worry about THAT. I did get some much stronger proofs as to who he
>is/was,
Such as?
Albert
and the "consensus" seems to have been the result of some kind of
>ganging mentality against him, which obscured the judgement of other members of
>this forum. There were also one or two jokers posting as if him.
>Also, he explained very much, too, not from programs.
>S.Taylor
>
>
>> in as much as his claims to
>>untold strength. Claims that he was Nunn or Short are bogus BTW. There was some
>>post, deleted by the moderators not long after it appeared, in which he or
>>someone else posing as him apologized for making a scene, admitted to being much
>>weaker, and not meaning any harm, etc. Only the actual moderators would be able
>>to attest as to its authenticity though.
>>
>>Remember, behind my computer, with a few engines at my disposal, I too can be a
>>super GM.
>>
>> Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.