Author: Ernest Bonnem
Date: 13:21:44 01/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2006 at 14:36:27, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 11, 2006 at 14:18:52, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>I've just been comparing rybka beta 9 to the original rybka beta. Beta 9 is >>winning 21 to 17 in five (1 sec inc) minute blitz. (similar margin to what vasik >>reports in the readme file) >> >>Anybody else have informal tests. If this result holds, it means Vasik has >>already improved the engine by about 30 points. >> >>best >>Joseph > >I think that measuring it against the same opponents in identical conditions >(using an opening suite such as Nunn2 or Noomen Select) is a better method to >measure. An engine against a modified version of itself will usually exacerbate >differences more than would appear against another engine. > > Albert Agreed, but that's more work! :-) Just for the record, my results (4min + 2sec, ShredderClassic GUI, Shredder9 book for both): 1st match: Beta 9 - original Beta 10 - 10 2nd match: Beta 9 - original Beta 11 - 9
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.