Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 17:28:46 01/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2006 at 10:51:32, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 11, 2006 at 10:24:43, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On January 11, 2006 at 10:12:33, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On January 11, 2006 at 10:03:05, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>On January 11, 2006 at 08:45:27, Albert Silver wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 11, 2006 at 08:32:57, stuart taylor wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 11, 2006 at 07:43:15, gerold daniels wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 11, 2006 at 04:40:02, stuart taylor wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On January 11, 2006 at 03:25:23, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>ryan, would you guess at how much stronger the next fruit will be? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>best >>>>>>>>>J >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Guess? My "guess" is that Rybka will remain on top, because A. Steen says that >>>>>>>>Fruit was still not as knowledgable as Fritz or Shredder, even when it was top, >>>>>>>>but Rybka DID do the trick, and played better chess (in his expert extimation) >>>>>>>>than all of them. >>>>>>>>Therefore, I havn't seen something which looked more promissing than Rybka, and, >>>>>>>>Rybka isn't finished for this year yet, either, and it might even continue >>>>>>>>updating throught the year, if need be. >>>>>>>>Shredder, we are waiting for now, and I think they are still ambitious to be on >>>>>>>>top, and we'll soon see if they were able to know how to do it. >>>>>>>>Junior we are also waiting for, perhaps. >>>>>>>>Hiarcs has already done its job, probably till next December or so. >>>>>>>>And there may be others. But so far, it looks like Rybka is the star. >>>>>>>>S.Taylor >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Hello Taylor. Rybka does look very good. However Fruit has some very good >>>>>>>programers like Ryan working to improve it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Gerold. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>P.S. Who is Steen.Can he really pick a good lottery number. >>>>>> >>>>>>Steen is someone else, who is quite well known in the chess world. >>>>> >>>>>Well-known to who? His buddies at the chess club? >>>>> >>>> >>>>A little bit more than that! (but I don't know if I have permission to say). >>>>S.T. >>> >>>The general consensus was that he was a fraud, >> >>I shouldn't worry about THAT. I did get some much stronger proofs as to who he >>is/was, > >Such as? > > Albert Now, now, Albert. The need for some CCC members to feel A. Steen is of supernatural chess strength is much like the basic need of religion. "Let the little children come to Him." :) -elc. > >and the "consensus" seems to have been the result of some kind of >>ganging mentality against him, which obscured the judgement of other members of >>this forum. There were also one or two jokers posting as if him. >>Also, he explained very much, too, not from programs. >>S.Taylor >> >> >>> in as much as his claims to >>>untold strength. Claims that he was Nunn or Short are bogus BTW. There was some >>>post, deleted by the moderators not long after it appeared, in which he or >>>someone else posing as him apologized for making a scene, admitted to being much >>>weaker, and not meaning any harm, etc. Only the actual moderators would be able >>>to attest as to its authenticity though. >>> >>>Remember, behind my computer, with a few engines at my disposal, I too can be a >>>super GM. >>> >>> Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.