Author: Alex Shalamanov
Date: 02:12:34 01/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2006 at 04:36:04, Gabor Szots wrote: >How can you tell? I can't, because I am too weak. But if I were strong enough to >tell, I wouldn't need either one of them at all. In correspondence chess using chess programmes for analysis is a must. There're very few players who do not use them. >There is a position in the positional part of WM-Test (No75) which has only been >solved by Fritz (many versions). This is of course only one example but it is >showing in the opposite direction. I don't believe test positions have something to do with real chess. They're more or less tactical, even those in WM-Test. Game analysis is the best judge. Of course, it's very subjective, but I find Rybka or Shredder more useful for my own CC games. Other correspondence chess players may differ from me. I used to use Fritz for analysis but it's not very good for my own games. Of course, it's my own point of view. Others may like Hiarcs or Fritz more. Best wishes, Alexander > >Gábor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.