Author: Albert Silver
Date: 09:55:45 01/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2006 at 11:13:41, Rafael Vasquez wrote:
>
>
>140 Rebel Decade Pentium 90 MHz 2176 29 -30 563 45% 2213
>27 Rebel 12.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2681 32 -32 484 57% 2630
>16 Pro Deo 1.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2724 27 -26 712 64% 2622
>
>
>Anyway, seem like NO program has improved 200 rating points on the same
>hardware
I'm trying to understand this thread frankly. Is it because Rybka is known to
have progressed several hundred points that you started it? If you take any
program of sufficient strength, and compare it to its earliest generations
you'll find a huge disparity. Just try comparing Hiarcs 4 with Hiarcs 10 on the
smae hardware. Fritz 3, 4 or even 5 with Fritz 9. You won't find them all on the
same hardware on the SSDF, but this is normal as they were many years apart, and
it would be kind of insane to test an engine that is neither the more recent
generation nor even competitive.
The above is bizarre since Rebel Decade is a freeware, dumbed down version of
Rebel 10, and Rebel 12 and PD1.1 are programs that are one generation apart.
As to the SSDF, the best I could come up with is:
3 Shredder 9.0 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2818 24 -23 995 70% 2667
33 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2660 26 -26 739 50% 2657
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.