Author: Russell
Date: 13:13:55 01/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2006 at 19:19:42, robert flesher wrote: >People tend to come to quick conclusions, including myself. However, this is a >mistake and deserves further attention. I have seen many test results from >people that run a 100 games at 3 min and then claim the setting is weak. Funny! >I will never test only blitz results as they can be greatly influenced by >factors that "CAN" possible weaken an engine at longer time controls. This is >not saying that being strong at blitz leads to that but perhaps does not gain as >much as when the time control increases. This has been my observation when >testing. > >My plan will be to play 1000+ games at various time controls 30 min or greater >and then if anyone is interested I can provide the games. However, I will not >hold my breath, when I concluded my 1000 game match between Fruit 2.1 and >Shredder 9.1 none asked. Oh well, its damn fun for me and I can learn about >chess. > >Lastly, anyone who does not see the potential of Thorsten settings needs to play >more games or check your settings (IMHO. Try 100 games at 30 min or greater, >you will be surprised, cheers Why dont u do simiilar test as u did with Fruit 2.2.1 vs Shredder Sandro. I think that would be interting.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.