Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 19:16:34 01/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2006 at 20:16:41, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On January 12, 2006 at 18:41:06, Neil Schemenauer wrote: > >>Speculative "what if" history discussions are never productive, in my >>experience. I guess Anthony feels the same way. > > >The point is not if the "what if" story was not productive or not. Using a >saying when you mentioned a monster is not a normal reaction, although if it is >only a saying. > >In this sense, Z reaction was unfortunated and unappropiated. > >He often wants to look funny but he crossed the line this time. He was right on the point. However I wouldnt agree with all who dont want to discuss if computerchess could have helped even such super players in their training and by that also their chess as such. This is worth a debate. But Anthony had the typical question in mind "what - - if". In fact this is always leading nowhere because one doesnt know. If he however wanted to compare Bobby Fischer with Hitler, that wouldnt be such a good idea and Bobby hasnt deserved that. Beyond all political opinions. What I observe is a huge difference with Anthony. He makes his point but doesnt "work" on other people endlessly. He's one of your favorites, right, like Albert? :) BTW are you actually in a team, if yes, where? Thanks in advance.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.