Author: Alex Shalamanov
Date: 00:31:13 01/13/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2006 at 03:22:26, Graham Banks wrote: >On January 13, 2006 at 02:44:33, Alex Shalamanov wrote: > >>On January 12, 2006 at 15:13:22, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>Just clarifying! :-) >> >>Uh, right. :-) I just spelled his name erroneously. And what's the Czub's >>setting like? Just 'Aggressive+Hyper Modern' or are there any additional >>changes? >> >>Alex > > >I believe that threat depth=5 and futility on are also used in addition to >aggressive and hypermodern. >I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong. > >Graham. Thanx. I've been trying H10 with the default setting. It's not that bad even with the default settings but IMHO it tends to be a little worse than Shredder9 'Columbus' egg S' in long analysis. Is CZUB setting better for blitz or long games? As far as I remember, Mark Uniacke used to believe that the default settying is the strongest for long games and analysis. Alex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.