Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ChessBase deficiencies

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:32:27 01/13/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 13, 2006 at 10:12:57, Tord Romstad wrote:

>On January 13, 2006 at 09:45:33, Gabor Szots wrote:
>
>>Best is HIARCS 10 with 106, worse is Crafty 20.1 with 52. Rybka solved 79. I
>>write
>>this by heart, I won't have access to the test machine until Monday.
>
>Thanks Gabor, then I don't have to worry about Glaurung's result.
>
>>The Arasan result was obtained under the condition of 60s per position, while
>>mine is under 10s/pos. That makes a difference.
>
>Yes, that certainly makes a big difference.  Thanks for clearing this up.
>
>Tord

I guess that the hardware in arasan site (AMD Athlon XP2500) is also better than
the hardware rgat Gabor used  because I believe that hiarcs should be strong
enough to be more than 6 times faster than arasan in the task of solving 109
positions.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.