Author: Gabor Szots
Date: 08:44:02 01/13/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2006 at 10:32:27, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 13, 2006 at 10:12:57, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>On January 13, 2006 at 09:45:33, Gabor Szots wrote: >> >>>Best is HIARCS 10 with 106, worse is Crafty 20.1 with 52. Rybka solved 79. I >>>write >>>this by heart, I won't have access to the test machine until Monday. >> >>Thanks Gabor, then I don't have to worry about Glaurung's result. >> >>>The Arasan result was obtained under the condition of 60s per position, while >>>mine is under 10s/pos. That makes a difference. >> >>Yes, that certainly makes a big difference. Thanks for clearing this up. >> >>Tord > >I guess that the hardware in arasan site (AMD Athlon XP2500) is also better than >the hardware rgat Gabor used because I believe that hiarcs should be strong >enough to be more than 6 times faster than arasan in the task of solving 109 >positions. > >Uri Not sure about that. I used a P4 3GHz machine which various tests show to be slightly slower than my home machine which is an Athlon XP 2500+.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.