Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: It's CZUB setting (Thorsten Czub)

Author: George Sobala

Date: 11:44:33 01/13/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 13, 2006 at 13:38:45, Graham Banks wrote:

>On January 13, 2006 at 09:09:15, Alex Shalamanov wrote:
>
>>On January 13, 2006 at 03:54:08, Graham Banks wrote:
>>
>>>On January 13, 2006 at 03:31:13, Alex Shalamanov wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 13, 2006 at 03:22:26, Graham Banks wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On January 13, 2006 at 02:44:33, Alex Shalamanov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On January 12, 2006 at 15:13:22, Graham Banks wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Just clarifying!   :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Uh, right. :-) I just spelled his name erroneously. And what's  the Czub's
>>>>>>setting like? Just 'Aggressive+Hyper Modern' or are there any additional
>>>>>>changes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I believe that threat depth=5 and futility on are also used in addition to
>>>>>aggressive and hypermodern.
>>>>>I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>Graham.
>>>>
>>>>Thanx. I've been trying H10 with the default setting. It's not that bad even
>>>>with the default settings but IMHO it tends to be a little worse than Shredder9
>>>>'Columbus' egg S' in long analysis. Is CZUB setting better for blitz or long
>>>>games? As far as I remember, Mark Uniacke used to believe that the default
>>>>settying is the strongest for long games and analysis.
>>>>
>>>>Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>It depends who you believe as to the relative merits of the default and Czub
>>>settings.
>>>According to CEGT ratings, hypermodern style (without all the other changes as
>>>in the Czub setting) performs slightly more strongly than default.
>>>Most of the results posted here with the Czub settings seem to be at blitz or 30
>>>mins per game levels and results seem to vary.
>>>
>>>Graham.
>>
>>Thanx, Graham. You've been very helpful. I've tried CZUB, CEGT and the default
>>one. Yeah, true. CEGT tends to be a bit stronger for long analysis.
>>
>>Alex
>
>
>Hi Alex,
>
>from Henrik's post above, it seems that futility should be off. Sorry to put you
>astray on that.
>
>Graham.

At blitz I have had better results with futility unchanged.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.