Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCC Retirement

Author: Walter Faxon

Date: 00:42:21 01/14/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 14, 2006 at 01:21:08, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On January 14, 2006 at 01:09:25, Stuart Cracraft wrote:
>
>>On January 14, 2006 at 00:51:30, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On January 14, 2006 at 00:13:03, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>One note...
>>>>
>>>>If you look around, 90% of the people that stop participating in actual computer
>>>>chess discussions are those that chose to go "commercial".  Or those that chose
>>>>to do something after lurking here for quite a while, then go off and become
>>>>ultra-secretive.  The other 10% either would like to go commercial, but don't,
>>>>or they just "burn out."  Burn-out is fairly common.  I can only think of one
>>>>person that is still active that was around when I started competing in CC
>>>>events.  Me.  Why I didn't "burn out" I have no idea.  And I haven't done so to
>>>>date either...
>>>>
>>>>The ones of us still releasing source code, or even if we are not, we still
>>>>choose to "hold nothing back" _still_ continue to discuss computer chess ideas.
>>>>I've been quieter than usual, because I have been busier than usual here at UAB,
>>>>and also because of the major changes being made in Crafty to get ready for the
>>>>next WCCC.  But eventually, everything I have been doing will become public, and
>>>>that will continue so long as I am able to continue doing this stuff, hopefully
>>>>for many years yet to go...
>>>>
>>>>Remember that it is just as reasonable to _start_ a thread on some CC topic as
>>>>it is to wait for others to start it, and then jump in.  In the past few years,
>>>>many have chosen to "go commercial" and that ends their participation in
>>>>technical discussions.
>>>>
>>>>That is sad, but it happens.  Fortunately there are still a few around that will
>>>>continue to discuss things, and continue to push themselves (and the silent
>>>>lurkers) forward year by year.  One simply has to decide whether to be an active
>>>>participant or just a lurker...
>>>
>>>Sometimes, they also get rejuvenated.  I think Bruce Moreland may be picking up
>>>interest again.
>>>
>>>When Ed Schroder retired from computer chess, he gave detailed instructions on
>>>how to write a good program on his web site.  He was often helpful with advice
>>>even when he was programming.
>>>
>>>I think in Christophe Theron's case, he discovered a beautiful woman and found
>>>out that they can be a lot more fun than even chess (drat!)
>>>
>>>I also think that the academic endeavor is the best approach in the long haul.
>>>
>>>I think that going professional would probably also take all or most of the fun
>>>out of chess programming.
>>
>>I don't put myself at any of their levels, but I did go away for a year,
>>and, with Don Beal's, Brian Richardson's, and Dan Homan's help, modify my
>>program so that it learns piece values from entirely randomized play starting
>>with all pieces equal to a pawn and no other evaluation knowledge besides
>>material. I am currently working on modifying it to do the same for non-material
>>pieces and encountering surprising resistance in the code.
>>
>>Brian convinced me to come back here and take a look at the goings-on and I am
>>it is all about Rybka and Fruit - two remarkable programs. I bought Rybka and
>>I downloaded Fruit. I've played one game against Rybka and briefly looked
>>at Fruit code enough that I know I still don't want to review another
>>programmer's code (in any application area) for any reason.
>>
>>I miss some of the longer discussions on computer chess programming but sobeit.
>>
>>Threads on the subject seem to die faster now here, but perhaps that's just a
>>misperception.
>
>I've been here a long time.  It goes in waves.  A lot of the programmers split
>time at the Winboard forum now, and I think that takes up a lot of their energy.


There is a good reason for that.  A programming thread here drifts off page one
in a day or so.  In a week they're only available in the archives, if at all.
But at the WinBoard forum (just checked) some topics go back for more than a
year.

I guess I just convinced myself to spend more time there.

-W



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.