Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 08:21:55 04/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 04, 1999 at 10:02:37, Adnan wrote: > >I think Deep Blue at best is not better than 2650 to 2700 Fide. People are >overestimating it's strength just because on few games. The twelve games that it >played in 96 and 97 weren't really impressive. Kasparov *lost* the 97 match by >playing weak. But as far as the quality of games is concerened, Deep Blue made >silly blunders, even tactical blunders, something which computers are supposed >to be at best. For example, Deep Blue's tactical blunder in game 2 that would >have forced a draw, or tactical blunder in game 6, 1996, where it could not even >calculate a simple combination accurately and allowed 22. Bxh7+. > >If took real pity, I would rate it at 2650 to 2700 Fide -- AT BEST. You're certainly entitled to your opinion! You won't convince me without some concrete variations, though! Maybe provide the FEN position after Black's 21st move, a winning PV for White, including replies to important deviations for Black? Or did I miss a previously demonstrated win posted here? Dave Gomboc
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.