Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 09:10:26 01/14/06
Perhaps I will also comment on Zappa next time but for now I must mention another Rybka topic. For some time now I must read something the like: ChessBase failures ChessBase GUI bugs ChessBase makes Rybka old ChessBase deficiences in super optimistic mode All such allegations have a common core and it is something dishonest. Let me explain so far. We have several tools and engines (as I explained probably 300!) and databases and the GUI of Chessbase allows UCI engines etc. You know what? If I were ChessBase I would quickly tweak ChessBase products and GUIs so that nobody could further test anything with Rybka! Duh! We have someone here who presents a buggy testversion, wants to recruit betatesters in masses, wants testresults and beccessarily all use ChessBase as GUI. Then these testers come here and do as if ChessBase were a complete crap and no Vasik does protest. He says thank you all you brave testers. Please continue to test I will make a fine GUI before next millenium... Something is wrong in that all. Instead of praising the flexibility of CherssBase GUIs everybody is criticising and complaining, Vasik makes his first multimillion and he doesnt even have an independent product! He uses this forum as cheap stage for declarations. Users discuss if they could attain the webpage of Rajlich etc. Something is wrong here! My moral question to all: Why in hell is Vasiks wish to make profit higher-valued and supported by all and ChessBase who invented all the state of the art is being dumped as if cheapo, dumb and nuts? Are we here all hypocrits? Could someone explain the actual confusion?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.