Author: Junior Carino
Date: 10:40:25 01/14/06
Go up one level in this thread
dont need to use chessbase. Arena's more than enough. On January 14, 2006 at 12:10:26, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >Perhaps I will also comment on Zappa next time but for now I must mention >another Rybka topic. > >For some time now I must read something the like: > >ChessBase failures >ChessBase GUI bugs >ChessBase makes Rybka old >ChessBase deficiences in super optimistic mode > >All such allegations have a common core and it is something dishonest. > >Let me explain so far. We have several tools and engines (as I explained >probably 300!) and databases and the GUI of Chessbase allows UCI engines etc. > >You know what? If I were ChessBase I would quickly tweak ChessBase products and >GUIs so that nobody could further test anything with Rybka! Duh! > >We have someone here who presents a buggy testversion, wants to recruit >betatesters in masses, wants testresults and beccessarily all use ChessBase as >GUI. Then these testers come here and do as if ChessBase were a complete crap >and no Vasik does protest. He says thank you all you brave testers. Please >continue to test I will make a fine GUI before next millenium... > >Something is wrong in that all. > >Instead of praising the flexibility of CherssBase GUIs everybody is criticising >and complaining, Vasik makes his first multimillion and he doesnt even have an >independent product! > >He uses this forum as cheap stage for declarations. Users discuss if they could >attain the webpage of Rajlich etc. Something is wrong here! > > > >My moral question to all: > >Why in hell is Vasiks wish to make profit higher-valued and supported by all and >ChessBase who invented all the state of the art is being dumped as if cheapo, >dumb and nuts? Are we here all hypocrits? > > >Could someone explain the actual confusion?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.